#VitalikOnEFSales
About VitalikOnEFSales
Facing pushback over the EF's ongoing ETH sales, Vitalik responded on X on May 25. He revealed the EF holds only ~0.16% of ETH supply and lacks sustainable income, prompting a decision to downsize and reduce selling. ~90% of his net worth remains in ETH. The EF will shift from "the center of the ecosystem" to "a mission-driven node" focused on censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security. A supply-side positive addressing long-standing concerns about centralization and sell pressure.
Hot
Latest
VitalikOnEFSales Popular posts
Vitalik just revealed a very different philosophy for the future of the Ethereum Foundation, and it may explain why Ethereum continues to stand apart from the rest of crypto.
The Ethereum Foundation is not trying to become a giant centralized power.
Instead…
EF is intentionally shrinking itself.
Selling less ETH.
Reducing its operational scope.
Focusing only on the strategic areas that only EF can truly push forward.
Because according to Vitalik: Ethereum should never have a single center of control.
EF is only one node inside a much larger ecosystem, not the owner of it.
What surprises many people is that EF currently holds only around 0.16% of the total ETH supply, far smaller than most imagine.
While many blockchains compete for TPS, speed, and narratives…
Ethereum is choosing a much harder path:
- censorship resistance
- privacy
- security
- open-source infrastructure
- true decentralization
Vitalik even stated:
“If Ethereum only tries to become slightly faster than competitors, it eventually just becomes another chain.”
And that may be the real story here:
Ethereum is not trying to become the fastest blockchain.
It is trying to become the one that survives the longest.
In a market obsessed with short-term growth…
EF is choosing:
- sustainability over expansion
- longevity over aggressive competition
And that may become Ethereum’s most important advantage in the AI and crypto era ahead.
#VitalikOnEFSales
#OKXPizzaDay
$BTC $ETH
Vitalik's influence declining is not a bearish sign, it's a sign of a maturing ecosystem.
Ethereum price might see a short-term dip due to this news, but the broader market will likely shrug it off. Market structure remains unchanged.
Most people miss that a decline in Vitalik's influence means more decentralized decision-making, which is a long-term bullish sign.
Will this reorganization lead to more efficient protocol updates and better scalability solutions, or will it create more bureaucracy and slow down development.
Follow me for more contrarian takes on the crypto market.
#VitalikOnEFSales $ETH
🚨 Vitalik Buterin recently spoke out in defense of the Ethereum Foundation amid criticism calling for the organization to intervene more aggressively in ETH price action and marketing efforts. He emphasized that EF is only one node within the Ethereum ecosystem, not its central authority, and said it will continue focusing on research, security, and decentralization.
Notably, EF reportedly holds just 0.16% of the total circulating ETH supply — far lower than many other protocol foundations, which often control between 10% and 50% of their token supply. The criticism comes as ETH is still trading more than 50% below its all-time high, while several senior EF members have departed and network revenue has dropped significantly following the 2024 Dencun upgrade.
#ICEBacksOKXOilPerps #RateHikeRepricing #VitalikOnEFSales

🧬 Ethereum’s decentralization narrative is entering a new phase. clarified on X that authority is shared across the board, while is leading the foundation’s restructuring so he can focus on long-term protocol research and technical direction.
📉 The foundation also plans to reduce its on-chain footprint to roughly 0.16% of total ETH supply and scale back ETH sales moving forward.
⚙️ The shift strengthens Ethereum’s image as a permissionless layer-1 with less centralized influence, which could improve sentiment among developers and ecosystem participants who value governance neutrality.
🌐 At the same time, a smaller coordinating body may make protocol upgrades, ecosystem grants, and strategic alignment more fragmented as L1 competition continues heating up.
👥 The key question now is whether community-led coordination can maintain the same pace and efficiency the Ethereum Foundation historically provided.
👁️ Big picture: reducing centralized influence removes a major control point, but it also removes one of Ethereum’s strongest engines for rapid coordination and execution.
⚠️ Personal analysis only. Not financial advice. DYOR.
#ICEBacksOKXOilPerps #RateHikeRepricing #VitalikOnEFSales
🔥 Today's trending topics are 3:
1. #ICEBacksOKXOilPerps
OKX partnered with **ICE** (owner of the NYSE) to launch perpetual crude oil futures contracts (Brent & WTI). This is a major step connecting the traditional oil market with crypto, allowing OKX traders to trade oil directly on the exchange.
2. #RateHikeRepricing
The market is reassessing interest rate expectations for the Fed and other central banks. Strong economic data + geopolitical factors are causing investors to adjust the probability of interest rate increases/decreases in the near future.
3. #VitalikOnEFSales
Vitalik Buterin commented on the Ethereum Foundation's sale of ETH. He confirmed that EF will reduce sales, scale back, and focus on core technologies (privacy, censorship resistance) instead of massive expansion.
$ETH $CL $BZ
#VitalikOnEFSales
Vitalik Just Killed The Biggest ETH Bear Argument In One Post
Vitalik responded to EF selling pushback on May 25. The numbers buried in his statement reshape the entire ETH supply thesis.
What Vitalik revealed. EF holds only 0.16% of total ETH supply. Foundation downsizing operations and reducing sells. 90% of Vitalik’s personal net worth remains in ETH. EF shifting from “center of ecosystem” to “mission-driven node” focused on censorship resistance, privacy, security.
Why this matters massively. For years, the bear case for $ETH centered on Foundation selling pressure. EF dumped millions every quarter. Critics called it endless dilution. That argument is now neutralized permanently.
The math. EF holdings at 0.16% means approximately 195K ETH ($430M). Reducing sells means less overhead pressure. Combined with 30% of supply staked and accelerating L1 transaction growth, supply-demand math just shifted decisively.
The bigger pivot. EF moving toward leaner role means less centralized direction. Protocol becomes more like Bitcoin in governance structure. Decentralization maximalists win the argument.
Coins benefiting. $ETH most obvious beneficiary. $LDO captures staking flows. $EIGEN restaking compounds. $ETHFI liquid restaking expands. $RPL decentralized alternative. $LINK essential for ETH-based tokenization.
L2 ecosystem amplifies. $ARB, $OP, $MNT, $STRK, $ZK, $MANTA, $IMX benefit from healthier ETH narrative.
Adjacent plays. $ONDO tokenized treasuries. $PENDLE yield trading. $ENA synthetic dollars.
The hidden truth. Harvard exited ETH at the bottom. Goldman cut 70%. They’ll look foolish when EF supply pressure disappears and ETH catches up to transaction growth.
Sentiment was lagging fundamentals. Now the lag closes.
Position before Goldman buys back at $4K what they sold at $2,200.
Not financial advice — DYOR.
#ETH #Vitalik #Crypto
Vitalik just went on record: the Ethereum Foundation is getting smaller on purpose.
Facing growing community pushback over the EF's ongoing ETH sales, he responded publicly on X, revealing that the Foundation holds just ~0.16% of total ETH supply with 99.1% of its treasury still in ETH. For comparison, most L1 foundations hold 10-50% of their native token supply.
The plan? Sell less, shrink the team, and survive longer. His exact words: "a smaller ship, a more opinionated one, but a longer-lasting one."
The key shifts:
· EF will narrow its mission to CROPS: Censorship resistance, Open source, Privacy, and Security
· Already staked 70,000 ETH (~$143M) to generate yield instead of selling
· Encouraging "other heroes" to step up where the Foundation steps back
The timing matters. Eight EF researchers have quit in 2026, five in May alone, following a loyalty pledge tied to the CROPS mandate. Not everyone signed on.
Vitalik also confirmed ~90% of his personal net worth remains in ETH. For holders, less sell pressure from the EF is a clear positive. But a leaner Foundation also means more responsibility falls on the broader ecosystem.
EF selling less, Vitalik still all-in. Does that change your confidence in ETH?
#VitalikOnEFSales
Vitalik just published a long post laying out a new direction for the Ethereum Foundation — and the headline is that it's going on a diet. The EF will scale back ETH sales from ~15% of its treasury per year down to just 5% by 2030, saying it wants to chase longevity over breadth. It's also stepping back from its role as central coordinator, refocusing on what Vitalik calls CROPS: censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security.
ETH is sitting around $2,113 right now, and the announcement landed without much of a pop — probably because the market's been skeptical of EF since the researcher exodus earlier this year. Still, Vitalik putting 90% of his personal net worth in ETH is a credible signal, and less selling pressure from the foundation combined with a narrower mandate could matter more over the next 12 months than it does today.
Is the EF becoming more like a protocol steward and less like a startup — and is that what Ethereum actually needs?
Just sharing my thoughts. Not financial advice. DYOR.
#VitalikOnEFSales #OKXOrbit
Vitalik just flipped the script on what Ethereum Foundation actually is — and it’s not what most traders expected.
EF was never designed to be Ethereum’s command center. It’s one node in a much wider network, focused on principles, not control. That re-frame changes how you read every Foundation move from here.
The plan is now clear: sell less ETH, shrink scope, and double down on security and decentralization over raw TPS speed. Vitalik’s blunt warning: if Ethereum only tries to out-scale everyone, it becomes just another chain.
He also defended top developers leaving EF, arguing Ethereum gets stronger when innovation happens outside the Foundation walls.
The real signal? Nearly 90% of Vitalik’s net worth is still in ETH. Not stocks. Not cash. Not hedges. That kind of conviction in a narrative-driven market cuts through noise.
For traders watching $ETH and $BTC, the takeaway isn’t about price targets — it’s about the shift in EF’s role. Less active selling, less operational sprawl, more ideological focus.
The watchpoint: how the market reprices ETH as a lower-supply, higher-conviction asset once the narrative resets.
Personal analysis only. NFA. DYOR.
$ETH $BTC #VitalikOnEFSales
Vitalik Just Killed The Biggest ETH Bear Argument In One Post
Vitalik responded to EF selling pushback on May 25. The numbers buried in his statement reshape the entire ETH supply thesis.
What Vitalik revealed. EF holds only 0.16% of total ETH supply. Foundation downsizing operations and reducing sells. 90% of Vitalik’s personal net worth remains in ETH. EF shifting from “center of ecosystem” to “mission-driven node” focused on censorship resistance, privacy, security.
Why this matters massively. For years, the bear case for $ETH centered on Foundation selling pressure. EF dumped millions every quarter. Critics called it endless dilution. That argument is now neutralized permanently.
The math. EF holdings at 0.16% means approximately 195K ETH ($430M). Reducing sells means less overhead pressure. Combined with 30% of supply staked and accelerating L1 transaction growth, supply-demand math just shifted decisively.
The bigger pivot. EF moving toward leaner role means less centralized direction. Protocol becomes more like Bitcoin in governance structure. Decentralization maximalists win the argument.
Coins benefiting. $ETH most obvious beneficiary. $LDO captures staking flows. $EIGEN restaking compounds. $ETHFI liquid restaking expands. $RPL decentralized alternative. $LINK essential for ETH-based tokenization.
L2 ecosystem amplifies. $ARB , $OP, $MNT, $STRK, $ZK, $MANTA, $IMX benefit from healthier ETH narrative.
Adjacent plays. $ONDO tokenized treasuries. $PENDLE yield trading. $ENA synthetic dollars.
The hidden truth. Harvard exited ETH at the bottom. Goldman cut 70%. They’ll look foolish when EF supply pressure disappears and ETH catches up to transaction growth.
Sentiment was lagging fundamentals. Now the lag closes.
Position before Goldman buys back at $4K what they sold at $2,200.
Not financial advice — DYOR.#ICEBacksOKXOilPerps #RateHikeRepricing #VitalikOnEFSales